We Provide Representation in Pennsylvania
We Provide Representation in New York
We Provide Representation in New Jersey
We Provide Representation in Florida
We Provide Representation in West Virginia
We Provide Representation in Delaware
We Provide Representation in Maryland

MSZL&M’s Cross-Examination Secures Verdict for National Retail Store

Jury Awards Only 25 Percent of Final Settlement Demand

MSZL&M Partner Louis Hockman recently secured an outstanding verdict for a national retail store when a jury awarded the plaintiffs roughly 25 percent of the plaintiffs’ final settlement demand (and approximately 40 percent of the lowest settlement recommendation made by the trial judge).

In this action, filed in Philadelphia County, the injured plaintiff tripped and fell in a parking lot and sustained a serious neck injury requiring cervical fusion with a subsequent revision.  At the time of trial, a third surgery was scheduled.   The plaintiff alleged permanent injuries to his neck, back and shoulder and his wife sought loss of consortium damages.

The plaintiffs had three children under the age of 12 and the plaintiff’s wife was working two jobs at the time of the incident.  The jury awarded the plaintiffs a damages award of only a fraction of the plaintiffs’ last settlement offer and the injured plaintiff’s wife was awarded no money for her loss of consortium claim.

The injured plaintiff claimed a significant loss of future earnings, alleging that he was being groomed for a high level position within his company as part of a “succession plan.” His supervisors testified that, as a result of his accident, he would no longer be promoted to this position. Plaintiffs’ vocational expert estimated his lost future earnings to be at least half of a million dollars and up to one and a half million dollars.  

However, the jury rejected this testimony and awarded no compensation for lost earnings capacity.  Mr. Hockman’s cross-examination of the plaintiffs’ vocational expert highlighted the errors in the plaintiffs’ vocational expert’s analysis and showed the speculative nature of the expert’s conclusions.


Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers L.L.P. publishes this site to provide general information regarding certain fields of law to our clients and friends. As every situation is unique and the facts and advice would vary with individual circumstances, the information contained on this site does not constitute legal advice. Transmittal of information from this site or any use of electronic mail is not intended to create or establish an attorney-client relationship between Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers L.L.P. and anyone else. Do not send any information until you speak with one of our attorneys and receive authorization to do so. If any communication from this site is not in conformity with the rules and regulations of any state governing lawyer conduct, Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers L.L.P. will not accept representation which is based on such communication.
 
Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers L.L.P. has offices in Wilmington, DE, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh PA, Wheeling, WV, New York and Long Island NY, Cherry Hill NJ, Miami and Tampa, FL. None of the attorneys listed in this Web site are certified as an "expert" or "specialist" pursuant to any authority governing the practice of law in the State of New York.