We Provide Representation in Pennsylvania
We Provide Representation in New York
We Provide Representation in New Jersey
We Provide Representation in Florida
We Provide Representation in West Virginia
We Provide Representation in Delaware
We Provide Representation in Maryland

Hockman Verdict

DEFENSE VERDICT IN PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS IN FALL-DOWN CASE AT BUSY RESTAURANT SUPPLY HOUSE.

            (PHILADELPHIA, PA, May 30, 2012)  MSZLM attorney Louis Hockman secured a defense verdict in favor of client RD America, an owner of a restaurant supply warehouse, following a bench trial on a fall-down case in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.   In the case, Roberta Williams v. RD America, LLC, plaintiff had been shopping for approximately a half hour and was going to place her last item (a rack of bread) in a cart prior to checking out.  Her cart was filled and was left in an area about 10 feet from where she eventually fell.  Plaintiff walked by the area of her fall, took a 3 x 4 foot rack of bread from a pallet and began to walk back to her cart.  As she was approaching her cart, an empty bread rack which had been placed on a display of water was, somehow, knocked off of the water display into her path.  Plaintiff stepped on the empty bread rack, causing her to trip forward, injuring her neck, back, wrist, and right shoulder. 

            Discovery disclosed that plaintiff had a prior incident during which she tore her right rotator cuff completely and surgery was recommended.  She treated with the same physicians in that incident as she did in connection with the instant matter.  However, her treating physicians conveniently omitted this significant medical history and attributed her right rotator cuff tear to the incident which is the subject of our litigation.

            At trial, Mr. Hockman challenged the existence of any negligence on behalf of our client.  Further, we argued that if it is found that our client was negligent, that such negligence was not the actual cause of plaintiff’s fall in light of her prior medical history.  While plaintiff’s counsel had, up until the time of trial, asserted a right rotator cuff tear as a result of this fall, he reassessed his position at trial and merely argued that plaintiff suffered an exacerbation of a previous existing condition. 

            The Court returned a verdict and judgment fully in favor of our client.   

 

 

Edited: SNC


Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers L.L.P. publishes this site to provide general information regarding certain fields of law to our clients and friends. As every situation is unique and the facts and advice would vary with individual circumstances, the information contained on this site does not constitute legal advice. Transmittal of information from this site or any use of electronic mail is not intended to create or establish an attorney-client relationship between Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers L.L.P. and anyone else. Do not send any information until you speak with one of our attorneys and receive authorization to do so. If any communication from this site is not in conformity with the rules and regulations of any state governing lawyer conduct, Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers L.L.P. will not accept representation which is based on such communication.
 
Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers L.L.P. has offices in Wilmington, DE, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh PA, Wheeling, WV, New York and Long Island NY, Cherry Hill NJ, Miami and Tampa, FL. None of the attorneys listed in this Web site are certified as an "expert" or "specialist" pursuant to any authority governing the practice of law in the State of New York.